"Dios" como un término teórico

Clemente Huneeus Alliende


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol7Iss2a455
Full text
PDF

Resumen

El presente trabajo propone reconsiderar algunas dificultades clásicas relacionadas con la significatividad y referencia de las proposiciones religiosas y explorar la posibilidad de lidiar con ellas bajo la suposición de que ‘Dios’ es un término teórico, es decir, una palabra que nombra una entidad no susceptible de observación directa pero aun así capaz de cumplir un rol explicativo dentro de teorías que pretenden explicar el mundo disponible a nuestra experiencia. La consideración de ciertos rasgos distintivos de los términos teóricos puede arrojar una luz nueva sobre varias temáticas discutidas en la filosofía de la religión contemporánea, especialmente porque entrega un marco nuevo desde el que pensar la naturaleza y funciones de la teología natural.


Huneeus Alliende C. "Dios" como un término teórico. Síntesis, Rev filos.. 2024;7(2): 31-59. Disponible en: doi:10.15691/0718-5448Vol7Iss2a455 [Accessed 9 Jan. 2025].
Huneeus Alliende, C. (2024). "Dios" como un término teórico. Síntesis. Revista de Filosofía, 7(2), 31-59. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol7Iss2a455

Referencias


Achinstein, Peter. 1965. “The Problem of Theoretical Terms”. American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (3): 193–203.

Alston, William P. 1988. “Referring to God”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 24 (3): 113–28.

———. 2005. “Religious Language”. En The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion, editado por William J. Wainwright, 220–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Artigas, Mariano. 1992. Filosofía de la ciencia experimental. 2°. Pamplona: EUNSA.

———. 1999. The Mind of the Universe. Understanding Science and Religion. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

Balzer, Wolfgang. 1996. “Theoretical Terms: Recent Developments”. En Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results, editado por C. Ulises Moulines y Wolfgang Balzer, 139–66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Benton, Matthew, John Hawthorne & Dani Rabinowitz (editores). 2018. Knowledge, Belief and God. Oxford University Press.

Crombie, Ian M. 1958. “The Possibility of Theological Statements”. En Faith and Logic. Oxford Essays in Philosophical Theology, editado por Basil Mitchell, 31–83. New York: Routledge.

Enć, Berent. 1976. “Reference of Theoretical Terms”. Noûs 10 (3): 261–82.

Flew, Antony. 2005. God and Philosophy. New York: Prometheus Books.

Flew, Antony, R. M. Hare & Basil Mitchell. 1955. “Theology and Falsification”. En New Essays in Philosophical Theology, editado por Alasdair McIntyre y Antony Flew, 96–130. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Flew, Antony & Roy Abraham Varghese. 2007. There is a God. How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind. New York: Harper-Collins e-books.

Forrest, Peter. 2017. “The Epistemology of Religion”. En The Stanford Encyclopedia of Religion, editado por Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2017. URL = .

Geivett, R. Douglas & Brendan Sweetman (editores). 1992. Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gellman, J. I. 1982. “God and Theoretical Entities: Their Cognitive Status”. In-ternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (3): 131–41.

Harris, James F. 2002. Anlytic Philosophy of Religion. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Hebblethwaite, Brian. 2010. “Natural Theology”. En A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, editado por Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper y Phillip L. Quinn, 2a ed., 196–203. West-Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hempel, Carl G. 1959. “The Empiricist Criterion of Meaning”. En Logical Positivism, editado por A. J. Ayer, 108–29. New York: The Free Press.

Huneeus, Clemente. 2022. “Triplex Via and the ‘Gap Problem’ with Cosmological Arguments”. New Blackfriars 103 (1106): 536–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbfr.12727.

———. 2023. “The Functions of Natural Theology in Thomas Aquinas: A Presumption of Atheism?” Religious Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412523000616

Kripke, Saul A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Massachusets: Harvard University Press.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Edition (enlarged). Vol. II. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 2. Chica-go: The University of Chicago Press.

Kvanvig, Johnathan L. 2020. “Anselmian adversities”. Religious Studies 56 (6): 318–32. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0034412518000604.

———. 2021a. Depicting Deity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

———. 2021b. “Metatheology and the Ontology of Divinity”. En The Divine Nature, editado por Simon Kittle y Georg Gasser, 138–57. New York: Routledge.

Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The methodology of scientific research programmes. Vol. I. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Laudan, Larry. 1978. Progress and Its Problems. Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.

Maitzen, Stephen. 1995. “God and Other Theoretical Entities”. Topoi 14:123–34.

Nielsen, Kai. 1966. “On Fixing the Reference Range of ‘God’”. Religious Studies 2 (1): 13–36.

———. 1974. “Empiricism, Theoretical Constructs, and God”. The Journal of Religion 54 (3): 199–217.

O’Leary-Hawthorne, J., y D. Howard-Snyder. 1996. “Are Beliefs about God Theoretical Beliefs?” Religious Studies 32 (2): 233–358.

Phillips, D. Z. 1979. “Religion Without Explanation”. Mind 88:152–55.

———. 2005. “Wittgensteinianism. Logic, Reality and God.” En The Oxford Hanbook of Philosophy of Religion, editado por William J. Wainwright, 447–71. Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.

Plantinga, Alvin. 1991. “The Prospects for Natural Theology”. Philosophical Perspectives 5:287–315.

———. 2000. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.

Popper, Karl R. 2005. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 2a ed. Routledge Classics. New York.: Routledge.

Ramsey, Ian T. 1957. Religious Language. An Empirical Placing of Theological Phrases. London: SCM Press.

Rundle, Bede. 2004. Why There is Something Rather than Nothing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swinburne, Richard. 2004. The Existence of God. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press - Oxford.

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1986. “The Migration of Theistic Arguments: From Natural Theology to Evidentialist Apologetics”. En Rationality, Religious Belief and Moral Commitment. New Essays in the Philosophy of Religion, editado por Robert Audi y William J. Wainwright, 38–81. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

———. 2005. “Religious Epistemology”. En The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion, editado por William J. Wainwright, 245–71. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zeis, John. 1993. “Natural Theology: Reformed?” En Rational Faith: Catholic Responses to Reformed Epistemology, editado por Linda Zagzebski, 48–78. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Copyright (c) 2024 Clemente Huneeus Alliende

Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.