Argumento cosmológico, principio de razón suficiente y monismo radical
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol7Iss2a454
Resumen
El argumento cosmológico en su variante racionalista está compuesto por al menos dos premisas fundamentales: la premisa según la cual hay seres explicados por otros seres y el principio de razón suficiente. Ambas premisas son plausibles si se las toma individualmente. El problema es que tomadas conjuntamente conducen a un resultado irracional. Aquí propongo sacrificar uno de los aspectos del principio de razón suficiente, precisamente aquel aspecto que nos conduce a tal resultado irracional. Sin embargo, este sacrificio implica aceptar que el argumento cosmológico fracasa en su propósito fundamental.
Referencias
Almeida, Michael. 2018. Cosmological Arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beiser, Frederich. 1987. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bennett, Jonathan. 1984. A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Blanshard, Brand. 1984. “Bradley on Relations.” En The Philosophy of F. H. Bradley, editado por Anthony Manser y Guy Stock, 211-226. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bliss, Ricki – Trogdon, Kelly. 2016. “Metaphysical Grounding.” En The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), editada por Edward. N. Zalta, URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/grounding/.
Bradley, Francis Herbert. 1930. Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay. 2ª ed., 9ª imp. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bradley, Francis Herbert. 1935. “Relations.” En Collected Essays, Vol. II, 629-676. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Briceño, Sebastián. 2021. “Monismo, relaciones, y los límites de la explicación metafísica.” Trans/Form/Ação 44: 285-410.
Briceño, Sebastián. 2023. “How the Principle of Sufficient Reason undermines the Cosmological Argument.” Kriterion 64: 651-671.
Collingwood, Robin George. 2005. “The Metaphysics of F. H.
Bradley: An Essay on ‘Appearance and Reality’.” En An Essay on Philosophical Method, editado por James Connelly y Giuseppina D’Oro, 227-252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dasgupta, Shamik. 2016. “Metaphysical Rationalism.” Noûs 50: 379-418.
Della Rocca, Michael. 2010. PSR. Philosophers’ Imprint 10: 1-13.
Della Rocca, Michael. 2018. “Playing with Fire: Hume, Rationalism, and a Little Bit of Spinoza.” En The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, editado por Michael Della Rocca, 464-481. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Della Rocca, Michael. 2020. The Parmenidean Ascent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gale, Richard. 2016. On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gerson, Lloyd. 1987. “Two Criticisms of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Philosophy of Religion 21: 129-142.
Harrop, Stephen. 2020. “On some Leibnizian Arguments for the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 37: 143-162.
Horgan, Terence – Potrč, Matjaž. 2008. Austere Realism: Contextual Semantics Meets Minimal Ontology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hume, David. 1993. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Reimp. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. [An Enquiry]
Hume, David. 1980. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Reimp. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. [Dialogues]
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Trads. P. Guyer y A. Wood. Cambridge University Press. [KrV]
MacBride, Fraser. 2011. “Relations and Truthmaking II.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111: 161-179.
Melamed, Yitzhak – Lin, Martin. 2023. “Principle of Sufficient Reason.” En The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition), editada por Edward N. Zalta y Uri Nodelman, URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/sufficient-reason/.
Pruss, Alexander. 2006. The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reichenbach, Bruce. 1972. The Cosmological Argument: A Reassessment. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
Reichenbach, Bruce. 2021. “Cosmological Argument.” En The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), editada por Edward N. Zalta, URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/cosmological-argument/.
Rescher, Nicholas. 2017. “Philosophy as Rational Systematization.” En The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology, editado por Giuseppina D’Oro y Søren Overgaard, 32-43.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowe, William. 1998. The Cosmological Argument. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
Rowe, William. 2007. Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2010. “Monism: The Priority of the Whole.” Philosophical Review 119: 31-76.
Spinoza, Baruch. 1985. “Ethics.” En The Collected Writings of Spinoza, Vol. 1, editado por Edwin Curley, 408-617. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Ethics]
Taylor, Richard. 1992. Metaphysics. 4ª ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
van Inwagen, Peter. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
van Inwagen, Peter. 2015. Metaphysics. 4ª ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Williamson, Timothy. 2002. “Necessary Existents.” En Logic, Thought and Language, editado por Anthony O’Hear, 233-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wollheim, Richard. 1959. F. H. Bradley. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sebastián Briceño
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
